1月1日起,减产协议正式开始实施。虽然是时隔8年达成的协议,但比达成协议更重要的是协议的具体实施。到底是虚晃一枪还是真心减产,让我们来看看俄罗斯国内对减产协议的不同看法。
作者 | Ekaterina Pokrovskaya
编译 | 白小明
俄罗斯已经做出了在2017年前六个月削减30万桶/天石油产量的承诺,其将与OPEC和其他非OPEC国家共同努力,实现全球石油减产近180万桶/天的目标,以消除过剩的产能。然而,俄罗斯能源部和俄罗斯石油公司近期均发表了前后矛盾和模棱两可的言论,让公众开始质疑其是否有能力真正拿出切实可行的减产方案并实施。
上有政策下有对策
根据俄罗斯能源部长Alexander Novak发表的声明,减产措施将逐步实施,各石油公司的减产额度将根据其产量进行分配。但,似乎仅有少数俄主要石油公司的高级管理人员相信各公司会做出减产承诺,并将其视为实施公司战略的必不可少的工具。
卢克石油公司(Lukoil)副总裁Ravil Maganov向媒体表示,目前关于每家石油公司的减产额度还没有制定统一的标准。“每家公司都必须根据自己的市场份额自行决定减产额度,同时还应考虑公司在市场上的特殊地位。”
Gazpromneft公司负责人Alexander Dukov对减产满怀信心,他相信俄石油公司有能力达成一个含各公司减产额度的协议。“虽然,不同公司关于达成协议存在选择性,但最重要的是,俄罗斯的总减产额度为30万桶/天,我们有能力将这一总额分配到不同公司。”
值得注意的是,尽管俄罗斯做出了减产承诺,Gazpromneft仍然预测公司的产量将在今年实现增长。公司预计相比2015年,2016年产量实现同比增长8-9%,预计产量从7970万吨增加到了8600-8700万吨。
Transneft公司总裁Nikolai Tokarev向TASS表示,虽然公司感到了一定的压力,但减产数量对公司来说还不算高。他还指出,根据与OPEC达成的协议,减少石油产量并不意味着缩减俄罗斯的石油出口量。减产协议指的是减少产量,就石油出口而言,公司将按照交货合同中的规定继续出货,而且他也不认为削减出口有什么巨大的意义。
正如去年12月10日在非OPEC会议上商定的那样,俄罗斯今年3月要将石油日产量削减20万桶,4月削减额将增至30万桶/天,使最终产量不超过1094.7万桶/天。
然而,据路透社报道,Novak上周在会议上指出,尽管与OPEC达成联合减产协议,但俄罗斯不会更改2017年的石油产量预测数据。俄罗斯能源部对2017年石油产量增长的预测将保持不变,年产量将达到5.48-5.51亿吨。
此外,Novak 明确表示,尽管俄罗斯与OPEC联合减产协议即将全面实施,但由公司签署并在政府间协议中提及的长期合同“将不受OPEC减产协议的约束”,因此实际的减产量意义并不会太大。
能源部的报告还指出,俄罗斯已经成立了一个俄石油公司特别委员会,负责跟踪减产协议的实施。根据能源部的说法,达成减产协议只能是出于自愿;对于不实施减产的公司还没有施加惩罚的计划;对于实施减产的公司,也不会有任何形式的损失赔偿。
俄罗斯减产黑历史
对于俄罗斯能否信守承诺,我们还不得而知,毕竟该国的“黑历史”也是一堆堆。智通财经曾发布文章《俄罗斯的原油冻产承诺不过是个笑话,信它不如让油价崩盘》,文中统计了俄罗斯不遵守减产诺言的黑历史:
1998年3月
石油价格自1997年1月的22美元/桶降到当时的12美元/桶,OPEC同意减产260万桶/天以支持价格。作为OPEC与非OPEC成员减产协议的一部分,俄罗斯同意降低出口61000桶/天。但这个份额相比于俄罗斯当时240万桶/天的出口水平只能说是象征性的。
最终,俄罗斯的日均原油产量在1998年同比仅减少了1%到达610万桶/天。同时,其出口反而同比增加3.5%到达240万桶/天。
1999年3月
随着价格跌到10美金/桶,OPEC同意进行新一轮减产,降低幅度在200万桶/天。非OPEC成员国中的俄罗斯,阿曼,墨西哥同意贡献减产份额中的30万桶/天。俄罗斯同意减产10万桶/天。
结果,俄罗斯的石油日产量在1999年升高了50000桶到达613万桶。它对国际市场的出口降低7万桶/天到达233万桶/天, 这是因为其将部分产量引向了海上储油装置市场。
2001年11月
迫于沙特阿拉伯的压力,俄罗斯提出减产仅仅3万桶/天,之后它将提议加大到5万桶/天。
2001年12月
受到OPEC持续要求支持价格的压力,俄罗斯同意在2002年第一季度削减出口15万桶/天。尽管这个约定,俄罗斯在该季度的产量几乎没有减少,根据美国电子工业联合会数字为736万桶/天。
尽管对非OPEC和OPEC的减产协议有许多乐观的评价,但一些专家仍然对所有参与国实现各自减产目标的能力和意图持怀疑态度;而且,OPEC国家过去也曾经撕毁过几次减产协议,让其臭名昭著。
不过,俄罗斯前财政部长、战略发展中心主任Alexey Kudrin还是认为,OPEC-非OPEC国家的减产协议是一个“相当合理的措施”。在接受RIA-Novosti采访时,Kudrin表示,“不幸的是,OPEC自身长期存在一个问题:其做出的所有承诺并不一定都能兑现。而且我不太相信减产措施可以长期影响油价,其影响力仅限于一到两年。”
花旗表示,油价可能在今年1月份对OPEC减产协议的遵守情况作出反应。
Russia has pledged to OPEC and other Non-OPEC countries to cut its oil output by 300,000 bpd in the first six months of 2017 in a joint effort to reduce the global oil glut by almost 1.8 million barrels a day. However contradictory and ambiguous statements made recently by the Russian Ministry of Energy and Russian oil companies raise some doubts as to whether the Russians are really able to carve out a joint course of action.
According to the announcement made by Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak last week, the production cut will be implemented gradually, and the cutting ratios will be apportioned to oil companies in line with their production volumes.
The senior executives of a few of the Russian leading oil-producing companies appeared to share a belief in making deals with each other as an essential tool to implementing the strategy .
According to Ravil Maganov, Vice –President of Lukoil, no set unified quota on an output reduction per producer have been established yet. “Each company will have to decide for itself in accordance with its share on the market. The companies shall curtail their output taking into consideration their specific position on the market,” stated the executive to press.
The Head of Gazpromneft, Alexander Dukov expressed optimism concerning the ability of the Russian oil producing companies to work out an agreement on specific reduction quotas with one another. “There are always options of making deals between the companies. The most important thing, is that the total output of Russia gets reduced by 300 thousand barrels a day, but we can sort the reduction scheme out between ourselves”,said Dukov.
It is noteworthy that despite Russia’s commitment to reduce output, Gazpromneft still forecasts the company’s production to grow in 2017. The company expects the 2016 results to reveal an 8 to 9 percent year on year production growth compared to 2015, with the projected output to rise from 79.7 mln. tons to 86-87 mln. tons.
Transneft President, Nikolai Tokarev stated to TASS agency: “We will certainly feel the pinch, but the volumes are not so exorbitant for us to get put out”.
Tokarev also pointed out that the reduction of oil output under the deal reached with OPEC does not imply any tangible cuts in Russian oil exports. “The point here is the output reduction. As far as the oil exports are concerned, we are going to ship as much as specified in delivery contracts, however, I do not suppose that the exports cuts will be substantial,” he announced.
As has been agreed at the non-OPEC meeting in on December 10, Russia will cut the daily output of oil by 200,000 bpd in March, raising the cut to 300,000 bpd in April, 2017, with the ultimate production figure not to exceed 10.947 million bpd
However, as Reuters reported, despite the joint curtailment agreement with OPEC, the overall Russian oil production forecast for 2017 is not going to be revised, as Novak pointed out at the meeting last week. The Russian Ministry of Energy maintains the same forecast on production growth to reach 548 – 551 million tons (11.01 -11.07 million barrels per day) in 2017.
Novak made it clear that the long-term contracts signed by companies and mentioned in intergovernmental agreements ” will not be subject to the reduction agreement with OPEC”, although he did note that the joint Russia-OPEC agreements would be implemented in full as the reduction of oil output would not be significant.
The Ministry has also reported that a special committee of Russian oil companies on monitoring the output reduction has been set up. According to the Ministry, entering into an agreement on output reduction can be only voluntary; there are no plans for imposing a penalty on companies who choose not to implement output cuts. Neither any compensation of losses is envisaged for the companies that do implement output cuts.
Despite some optimistic assessments of the Non-OPEC/OPEC deal, some experts remain quite skeptical with regards to the ability and intentions of all the reckoning countries to keep their end of the deal; moreover OPEC countries are quite known for having broken off the agreements reached in the past several times.
Thus, the Head of Strategic Developments Center, former Russian Minister of Finance Alexey Kudrin views the recent OPEC-NON OPEC agreement on output reduction as“quite a rational measure”, although he doubts that all the undertaken obligations under the agreement will be fulfilled. “This unfortunately, is already an existing problem with OPEC: the promises made were not always kept. I do not believe in long term ability of this measure to impact the oil prices. Its impact is limited to one and half to two years.” RIA-Novosti reported Kudrin as saying.
未经允许,不得转载本站任何文章:
-
- Linda
-
石油圈认证作者
- 毕业于南开大学传播学专业,以国际权威网站发布的新闻作为原始材料,长期聚焦国内外油气行业最新最有价值的行业动态,让您紧跟油气行业商业发展的步伐!