低油价环境下,钻机数量剧烈下降,上游勘探开发支出减少,海洋油气开发投资高且回报周期长使得油气巨头们不得不重新考量资本支出的方式。在这种情况下,私募股权的进入使得小公司有了更多参与的机会,而这也会进一步影响到整个行业的变化,使得油价的回升变得扑朔迷离。
全球油价大跳水使生产商们更加保守,几乎只在高回报的钻探项目上投资,并且竭力降低资本。海洋油气行业不可避免采取了同样的策略,全球海上钻井数量与去年同期相比平均下降25%,值得注意的是,陆上钻井数量下降的更多,达到了50%。
尽管海上钻井数量可能会像陆上一样继续减少,但全球知名会计师事务所德勤(Deloitte)相信,生产商并不会轻易放弃他们长期投资的大型项目。海上项目的运作周期很长,因而即使油价一路狂跌,也并不会在短期内对当前的钻探项目造成直接影响。但是,全球原油过剩导致的低油价时代还会持续,未来几年的投资项目决策将变得加困难。
Rigzone公司的数据表明,全球目前正在开发的海上项目中有60%是深水项目。
尽管许多预测认为,WTI油价将在2020年前逐渐回升至80美元/桶,但这同时意味着市场需要漫长的时间去恢复,石油公司也需要更长的时间对战略投资进行再分配。
海上油气项目的运作周期很长,对油价长期走势的预测会左右投资决策的制定。尽管目前有许多业内人士对未来五年乃至更长时期的油价做了诸多预测,但是只有油公司内部评估的油价才会最终决定项目是否具备实施条件。对油价的预测主要有以下两种观点:
1.鉴于页岩油在低油价下争夺市场份额,原油产量将会大幅减少,油价在几年后会回升到80美元/桶。一些潜力巨大的海上项目将被通过并快速推动。
2.生产商对大型页岩油气开发成本的精打细算确保其产量并不会剧烈下降。另外,据EIA预测,由于全球性经济衰退,原油需求不再会大幅增涨,价格稳定在60美元/桶更为合理,这种情况将导致一大批项目下马而无法执行。
另外,有太多的不确定因素会影响油价预测的准确性。然而每家公司都要依据油价预测来决定他们应该采取积极还是温和的中长期策略。公司内部的预测也会继而影响到全球各大海上油田区块的投资战略。
墨西哥湾的多数石油巨头决定效仿陆上原油生产商的策略,以求在短期内获取最高的投资回收率同时承担较低的经济风险。这意味着勘探的预算将被大幅削减,开发和维护成本将会在未来几年里占据预算的主要部分。油公司通过低成本运行以维持项目的经济可行性。但为了长期均衡的发展,有野心在海上油气开发中立足的公司们仍需要创造一些新的发展机遇,这意味着勘探投资不该被完全取消。
据悉,墨西哥湾的一个大型油公司已经公开表示将会对一些有利区块展开勘探,并以2017年为界决定项目实施的先后顺序。评价标准主要涵有地质概况、商业风险以及勘探成本。该公司打算将一些前期工作外包至其他利益相关方以共同承担风险。
无论石油公司最终是否执行高风险项目,对行业前景做预测判断都是一种磨练,这对每家公司来说都有着重大的意义。这种磨练使得公司能从战略角度更好的考虑如何进行资本分配,这种考虑不只局限在当前一年,而是着眼于未来五年。
陆上生产商们可以更加灵活的调整战略,在油价回升时可以迅速在收益率高的区块开钻新井,而海上项目需要从长远角度来进行评价,同时要有完整的计划来树立信心,这种魄力使得在产能建设期间的海上项目仍然能提供不错的投资回报。
WTI期货价格趋势
除了油价之外,海上油田开发还有很多需要考量的风险因素,有上文提及的地质风险,也有建造基础设施的经济风险,甚至还有潜在的政治风险。墨西哥湾和北海这些管辖区域政治风险比较低,并具有良好的财政体制,据此可以稳定的预测未来五年甚至更久的发展情况。
非洲以及东南亚地区则需面对较高的政治风险,因为即使这些区域有着十分诱人的储量,仍然有很多项目不得不被放弃,在当前的油价下油公司根本不敢轻易去承担这种巨大的风险。
Rigzone公司的数据表明,当前正在开发的全球海上油气项目约60%是深水项目,剩下的40%是浅海项目。美国墨西哥湾的油气开发更倾向于深水,大约有75%的平台瞄准了深水区域。尽管油价低迷,但通过合作、私募股权投资以及把握机遇,深水油气发展在这些区域仍然收益不匪。
在过去,由于巨大的资本支出,海上油气领域都由油气巨头在开发。而现在私募的小股权已经表现出投资这些项目的意愿,而这也让那些小型独立公司有了“一战成名”的机会。这一变化能够改变海上油气勘探开发的格局,尤其是当巨头们对机遇表现出消极态度的情况下。
与去年相比,关于油价需要多久才会回升这一问题,德勤(Deloitte)的观点已经不再那么激进。作为全球知名会计师事务所,德勤对期货市场的预测无论在短期还是长期均变得相对乐观。在2015年5月,期货市场对2020年WTI油价的平均预期为68美元/桶。在2015年11月,同样是2020年的期货市场预期变得更加疲软降至57美元/桶。一些人认为在石油行业如此巨大的波动之下,期货市场将会变得更加保守,这都是对前景不乐观的表现,会从根本上影响未来长期的重大项目的投资决策。
德勤预计2016年短期项目将进一步收紧,这些项目的关注点在于资本的高效回收上。由于行业震荡已经持续一年有余,油公司已经逐渐适应在寒冬中谋生,所以项目数量上的缩减并不会像2015年那样暴跌25%。这些公司将对自己的资产重新评估并作出一揽子解决方案,这一切都将左右未来5年海上油气工业的形势。
Industry slowly adjusting to low oil price environment
The current drama in worldwide oil prices has led producers to manage drilling prospects and maximize lower capital budgets to their highest return projects. The offshore oil and gas industry is no exception to this trend, with the rig count dropping on average globally by ~25% from this time last year. Onshore rigs have dropped substantially more in that same time period, by greater than 50%.
While it is possible that the offshore industry will reach this same ultimate drop in rigs, Deloitte believes it is unlikely as it expects producers to require the larger projects to be maintained in their long-term portfolio. Offshore projects require long lead times and a sudden drop in prices, such as in late 2014/early 2015, did not have as sharp of an immediate impact. However, lower oil prices are expected to continue due to the global oversupply of oil, and project decisions for the next few years are expected to become more complex.
Rigzone data indicates that global offshore projects that are currently under development are about 60% deepwater. (Graphs courtesy Deloitte)
Many expect that oil prices will slowly increase to $80/bbl WTI by 2020, but this means a slower recovery and a number of years of strategic allocation of capital.
Given the long lead time of offshore projects, the long-term view on oil price, not near term, will dictate investment decisions. While there are many forecasts in the industry that have shared their expectations for the oil price over the next five years and beyond, the internal view of a company on the ultimate stabilized oil price will dictate the project sanctioning decisions. Consider two scenarios that are a focus within the industry:
Production will decrease and slow dramatically as shale oil struggles to compete at low prices, and oil will rise back up to $80/bbl in the next few years. Any strong offshore projects are likely to be given the greenlight for development.
Shale oil production will not drop steeply as producers manage costs on these large resources. Couple this with demand not growing as robustly as the EIA has forecast (due to economic recessions or downturns in various countries), then a long-term oil price of $60/bbl might be more reasonable and that would lead to a number of projects falling off the list.
There are too many variables to forecast oil price with a high degree of confidence but each company will have to decide how conservative or aggressive they want to be in that medium- to long-term oil price arena. A company’s internal forecast will continue to drive major investments in offshore plays globally.
The supermajor producers in the Gulf of Mexico have mostly decided to follow the same strategy as onshore producers in targeting their highest rate of return projects which have lower commercial risk. This means exploration budgets have been slashed and development and maintenance capital is making up the bulk of the capital spending in the coming years, with significant cost-cutting measures undertaken to maintain favorable economics on projects. To balance long-term growth, companies that intend to stay in offshore plays long term still need to explore for some new development opportunities. This means that exploration budgets cannot be eliminated completely.
For example, one major player in the GoM has publically disclosed it will high-grade its exploration prospects and determine which ones it will likely not get to prior to 2017. The prospects were likely evaluated on the basis of geologic and commercial risk and cost to explore, among other criteria. This company intends to sell those leases to any interested parties.
This ranking of company prospects is an exercise that has significant value for any company regardless of whether they intend to dispose of higher risk prospects. That type of exercise allows companies to think strategically about how to best allocate their capital not just this year, but in the coming five years. Onshore producers, due to rapid mobilization, have the ability to be nimble and only drill wells in their highest netback areas when prices recover. However, offshore projects require a long-range view and significant planning to build confidence that at the date of first production their projects are still providing a decent return on their investment.
WTI futures trends
There are other risk factors to developing offshore projects globally than just price. There is the previously mentioned geological risk but also commercial risk due to access to infrastructure and even political risk. Jurisdictions such as the US GoM and the North Sea have low political risk with well-established fiscal regimes that create predictability when planning for development five years out. African countries and even Southeast Asian nations may pose a greater risk politically. This could lead to sidelining projects in those areas at a higher rate as companies cannot afford to take that risk in this price environment, even though those areas may have higher volumes.
Data from Rigzone indicates that global offshore projects that are currently under development are about 60% deepwater with the remaining being shallow water. In the US Gulf of Mexico, the development is heavily slanted toward deepwater projects with 75% of the contracted rigs targeting those opportunities. Deepwater development is expected to continue in this area of world, despite low oil prices, through partnerships and private equity investment and greater opportunity size. In the past, mostly large major oil and gas companies were players in offshore plays due to the massive capital commitment required. However, private equity has shown a recent willingness to fund these types of ventures and have allowed small independent companies to “hit the ground running.” This could change the landscape of the players in offshore exploration and development especially if the supermajors do not pursue all their portfolio of opportunities available.
Deloitte’s view of how long a price recovery will take has tempered over the last year. The company refers heavily to the futures market when creating its forward price views, which has softened throughout the year for both short-term and long-term oil prices. In May 2015, the futures market averaged a 2020 WTI oil price of $68/bbl. In November 2015, the same futures market had become more bearish and the 2020 WTI oil price was $57/bbl. Some argue that in times of great volatility, the futures market will be overly conservative but this is symptomatic of decreased optimism and will ultimately enter into investment decisions for long-term, expensive projects.
Deloitte expects 2016 will be a year with further pullbacks in near-term activities focused on capital efficient projects. The pullback will likely not be as drastic as the 25% global reduction seen throughout 2015 as most of the initial shock has been absorbed. Companies will be taking stock of their assets and making portfolio decisions that will effect their position in the offshore industry five years from now.
未经允许,不得转载本站任何文章:
-
- 徐建鹏
-
石油圈认证作者
- 毕业于中国石油大学(华东),油气田开发硕士。第一时间为您提供原创国际油气资讯,真实反映每时每刻新闻热点,秉承国际化视野,力求及时、客观、权威、独立地报道新闻。